Iran rejects Trump's 15-point plan to end the war... The intersection of Hormuz, nuclear weapons, and sanctions
State media reported that Iran has not agreed to the US's 15-point plan to end the war. While the U.S. plan calls for blocking nuclear weapons, missiles, and proxy forces and reopening the Strait of Hormuz, Iran appears to have put forward conditions such as compensation for war damage, a cessation of attacks, and control of the strait.
Published
March 26, 2026
Updated
-
Author
News Desk
Reading time
4 min read
Status
Public
Views
0
Today
0
Desk
World Desk
Source: BBC (cited by Reuters), 2026-03-25. The information below is based on published reports.
1) What happened now?
Iran has rejected US President Donald Trump's "15-point plan to end the war," Iran's state-run Press TV reported. Press TV, citing unnamed “senior political and security officials,” said Tehran had laid out its own five conditions for ending the war.
The American plan was revealed by Israel's Channel 12, and US government officials are said to have confirmed its existence. However, the Iranian terms revealed by Press TV are different from items such as nuclear and missile restrictions or the “re-opening” of the Strait of Hormuz, and are interpreted as a significant departure from the starting points of the two sides.
2) The trigger of the war and recent developments (based on article)
According to reports, the war began with airstrikes by the United States and Israel on February 28, and Iran has since expanded its hostilities by targeting U.S. allies in the Gulf region. In this process, it is repeatedly mentioned that the risk of regional conflicts spreading to energy and maritime transportation routes has increased.
The report, citing Press TV, listed “a complete cessation of attacks and assassinations” as one of Iran’s key conditions. The article introduces that the Israeli side has been using the expression ‘cut off the head of an octopus,’ and also includes information that key Iranian leadership figures were killed in an airstrike on Tehran in the early stages of the war.
3) Trump’s 15-point plan: Centered on blocking nuclear weapons, missiles, and proxy forces
The major pillars of the U.S. plan as reported by Channel 12 are summarized as a promise that “Iran will not pursue nuclear weapons,” the dismantlement of nuclear facilities, and a structure in which the enriched uranium it possesses is handed over to the IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) for follow-up monitoring. The BBC added that the United States has presented ‘blocking the development of nuclear weapons’ as a justification for war, and Iran has consistently denied this.
Another axis is limiting the range and quantity of missile programs and stopping funding for regional proxy forces such as Hezbollah (Lebanon), Hamas (Gaza), and Houthis (Yemen). It is said that it also includes language that international sanctions against Iran will be lifted if conditions are met, and the article explains that the sanctions were fully reimposed after the suspension of inspections of Iran's nuclear facilities “last November.”
4) Iran’s five conditions: compensation, prevention of recurrence, and control of Hormuz
Iran's terms, as reported by Press TV, appear to include a demand for (1) a complete cessation of “enemy attacks and assassinations,” (2) a “concrete mechanism” to ensure war is not forced again, (3) payment of war damages and reparations, (4) maintenance of Iran’s sole control over the Strait of Hormuz, and (5) an end to Israeli attacks on Iran’s regional allies.
In particular, the article points out that in the case of a “recurrence prevention mechanism,” it is unclear what guarantees are possible and which countries will participate and monitor. It is interpreted as a characteristic that the demands are structured around war responsibility, security guarantees, and regional military action, rather than being directly linked to the Trump plan's restrictions on nuclear weapons, missiles, and proxy forces.
5) Why the Strait of Hormuz becomes the ‘price tag’ for negotiations
The US reportedly included a demand to reopen the Strait of Hormuz as a “free maritime corridor.” The BBC explained that this strait is a strategic point through which about one-fifth of the world's oil and gas supply passes, and the mere possibility of a blockade caused international oil prices to soar and concerns about a global economic downturn increased.
President Trump said on the 25th (local time) that Iran was “desperate to negotiate” and claimed that Iranian negotiators had given the United States a “very important gift.” He only mentioned that the ‘gift’ was related to oil and gas and the Strait of Hormuz, but did not reveal specific details, so it appears that strait traffic and energy flows are being used as negotiating leverage.
6) Negotiation prospects and variables: who, by what process, and to what extent can it be stopped?
The BBC mentioned the possibility that if negotiations proceed, they will be led by Trump's peace envoy Steve Wittkoff and Jared Kushner (son-in-law). In addition, while he believed that the process of ‘initial ceasefire → detailed adjustment’ could be replicated, like the past negotiation model in the Gaza Strip, he observed that the Israeli leadership may be passive in stopping airstrikes at this stage.
Israeli Economy Minister Nir Barkat told the BBC it was unlikely Iran would agree to Trump's terms, adding: "We will achieve our goals with or without an agreement." On the other hand, on the Iranian side, it is unclear who is actually in contact with the United States, and the article also states that Iran's new Supreme Leader (Mojtaba Khamenei) has not been seen since being injured in the attack on February 28, so the decision-making system is interpreted as a variable that will limit the speed and form of negotiations.
7) Summary of key people and organizations (based on article + background other than article)
The key sources in this report are Iran's state-run Press TV (citing an anonymous senior official) and Israel's Channel 12 (revealing the American version). With regard to nuclear inspection and surveillance, the IAEA is mentioned as the implementer of the U.S. plan, and lifting and reimposing sanctions repeatedly appears as an economic incentive to end the war.
Speakers in the article include President Trump (“desperate,” “an important gift”) and Iranian Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf (“there were no negotiations with the United States,” claiming “fake news for market manipulation”) in the foreground. On the Israeli side, Prime Minister Netanyahu's hard line was mentioned, and Minister Barkat publicly expressed his skepticism about negotiations.
Background (outside the article): The crisis surrounding the Strait of Hormuz has repeatedly increased oil price volatility in the past, and the market has reacted more sensitively to the “continued risk of blockade” than to the “actual blockade.” Because of this structure, it is often pointed out that energy and freight rates indicators can fluctuate simply by changing diplomatic language or strengthening maritime security.
8) One line from an investor's perspective (light note)
From the perspective of buying a leveraged ETF, the only thing to check is that headlines such as “Is Hormuz risk decreasing/increasing” can significantly increase short-term volatility.
However, in this case, sanctions, nuclear weapons, missiles, and regional fronts are all intertwined at the same time, so it seems likely that the ‘exchange of conditions’ will take longer rather than being resolved immediately with a single announcement.
In summary, the US plan bundles control of nuclear weapons, missiles, proxy forces, and reopening of the strait into a package, while Iran puts compensation, security guarantees, cessation of regional attacks, and control of the strait at the forefront. The next points of interest appear to be (1) whether a ceasefire is actually declared, (2) specific language regarding the resumption of IAEA inspections or how to handle enriched uranium, and (3) changes in military tension in the Strait of Hormuz.
Related Dispatches
More stories worth reading
Grouped around the closest editorial context inside the desk.
The BBC relayed warnings from Palestinians that while international attention was distracted by the war with Iran, Israeli settler violence was spreading to a new level in the occupied West Bank. Tensions appear to be increasing as attacks on villages near Nablus, death and migration statistics compiled by the UN, and Israeli political circles' settlement policies intersect.
The BBC reported that Israel announced that it would create a 'defensive buffer zone' that would control a large area of southern Lebanon as part of an operation targeting Hezbollah. Israel said it had blown up five bridges over the Litani River, and Lebanon's Health Ministry said there had been 1,072 deaths as of March 24.
After the United States and Israel struck Iran on a large scale, it was reported that Iran is responding with missile and drone attacks against Israel and U.S.-affiliated countries in the Gulf region. As the front line in Lebanon opens, casualties and energy and logistics shocks appear to be increasing simultaneously.